Last week the nation witnessed the horror of the events in Arizona. Politicians on the Left were quick to point out Sarah Palin’s website happened to have a graphic featuring certain politicians with the symbol of crosshairs over their faces. Arizona Congresswoman Gabby Gifford was one of them. So began a national tussle over the effect of violent words in politics. Both sides are equally to blame. The right reminded everyone that the President had once said about fighting his opponent's “If they bring a bat, we bring a gun” etc.
With all this talk rumbling about, an interesting thing happened on CNN last night.
CNN anchor John King issued an on-air apology to his viewers Tuesday for the terminology guest Andy Shaw of the Better Government Association used during a broadcast of "John King, USA".
Shaw used the term, "in the crosshairs" while the pair discussed the mayoral race in Chicago.
King apologized saying:
"Before we go to break, I want to make a quick point. We were just having a discussion about the Chicago mayoral race just a moment ago. My friend Andy Shaw, who now works for a good government group out there, used the term 'in the crosshair's in talking about the candidates out there. We're trying, we're trying to get away from that language. Andy is a good friend. He's covered politics for a long time. But we're trying to get away from using that kind of language. We won't always be perfect, so hold us accountable when we don't meet your standards."
Alrighty then. If we all learn not to say anything violent we will have peace & harmony. The lion & the lamb will lay down together & the streets will flow with dark chocolate.
Oddly, after hearing that bit from John King (who I usually like) I turned to ABC to watch V, a show Harold & I have really enjoyed. Last night I had to turn it off. The theme of the night was torturing humans & aliens. Aliens were hung from chains so that their skin could be cut off of them as they screamed in pain. A human had several spikey things attached to his body so current could go into him to test the Queen V’s daughter’s willingness to torture someone. That is when I clicked away.
We can get all picky and uppity about not saying “in the crosshairs” but then we go home and watch popular TV & movie dramas that emphasize brutality all for our enjoyment. What is accomplished by our censoring words? If we are really committed to having a less violent country it has to encompass not just vocabulary & political dialogue, but movies, games, etc.
As a writer I am acutely aware of the power of words. I become concerned however, when we assign them too much power, resulting in an emphasis on being politically correct but not changing the violence behind the word which imbues it with power in the first place.
Which do you think is more powerful; the word or the graphic image? Let me know.